Image result for Alleged 3.1bn fraud: What happened at Suswam’s trial on Thursday

Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, adjourned the trial of Sen. Gabriel Suswam untill Jan. 31.
Justice Abang gave the ruling after the defence counsel informed the court that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)’s counsel, Leke Atolagbe, had just served them with the additional proof of evidence in the ongoing case.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) report that Suswam and the then Commissioner for Finance in his administration, Omadachi Oklobia, are being prosecuted before the court on N3.1 billion money laundering charges.
They were accused by the EFCC of diverting the money which was said to be part of the proceeds of the sale of some shares of Benue State in a company.
Sen. Suswam, a former Governor of Benue. presently represents Benue North-East Senatorial District.
Justice Abang had, on Nov. 26, adjourned the trial continuation till Jan. 30.
At the resumed hearing on Friday, the 1st defendant (Suswam)’s counsel, Chinelo Ogbozor, enumerated reasons the court should adjourn the matter.
She argued that the case was presently before the Court of Appeal and that the court had reserved a judgment in the suit with number: CA/A/1007C/2019, urging the court to adjourn pending the delivery of judgment by the court.
Ogbozor also said that the prosecution counsel had just served them with about 200-page additional proof of evidence the previous day (Jan. 29), thereby denying them of the adequate time and facility to respond to the application as provided for by Section 36(6)(b) and Item 4 of the Practice Direction of the Federal High Court.
Also speaking,Counsel to 2nd defendant, Paul Erokoro, SAN, said besides that the EFCC lawyer served them the document the previous day, some of the pages were illegible.
However, in his argument, the prosecution counsel, Atolagbe, disagreed with the defence counsel.
In his ruling, the judge, who refused to grant Ogbozor’s request based on the Appeal Court’s trial, said the defendants’ demand could only be granted as a result of the delay by the prosecution to serve them on time.
“I think the defence has a point here,” Justice Abang held.
On the illegibility of some of the pages in the additional proof of evidence by the EFCC, the judge said it was a subjective issue and the court could not make a pronouncement on this.
Justice Abang, therefore, adjourned the trial continuation to give the defence adequate time and facility to study the additional proof of evidence served on them by the EFCC.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post